Em 09-08-2013 19:20, Adam D. Barratt escreveu: > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 03:04 +0100, Rui Miguel P. Bernardo wrote: >> Since the bug will get fixed in unstable (and later in testing), I would >> like to request to fix it in stable. > [...] >> If all is ok here I think 'm almost ready to proceed to the next step >> and use reportbug report a bug against "release.debian.org" >> pseudo-package with the attached debdiff attached (I'm following the >> example from http://bugs.debian.org/714759). > Thanks for your - very expansive :-) - mail regarding this bug, and for > caring about getting it fixed in stable. > > In general, we strongly prefer having the bug fixed in unstable before > we look at a fix for stable; this helps ensure that (at least most) > issues with the fix are spotted before they make it in to a stable > update and reduces the likelihood of the fix not being included in the > next stable release.
I understand that's the normal process. I guess this bug could be an exception, for it's simplicity. > > Looking through the bug log, it appears that the maintainer previously > indicated that they'd be receptive to an NMU, so hopefully getting it > resolved in unstable shouldn't be too much of an issue. Did you really mean "unstable" in your last sentence? Or did you mean "stable" instead of "unstable"? > > Regards, > > Adam > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
