On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > Sergei Golovan <[email protected]> (2013-09-30): >> I've uploaded this change to unstable (and it already hit testing). No >> complains whatsoever. > > yes, I saw that, and that's nice. That doesn't buy us squeeze→wheezy > upgrade testing, though, which is what we would like to avoid breaking > or worsening.
True. But as far as I see, the current situation with this upgrade is far from perfect. It silently breaks expectk and packages which depend on it. With conflict the user can choose whether to remove expectk or to retain the old expect. Cheers! -- Sergei Golovan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caoq2pxf0dwj0ib-2n+q+h5hoiksjaaalrrxh8ewtmc0nzab...@mail.gmail.com
