Your message dated Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:35:49 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#723953: nmu: gtk+3.0_3.8.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #723953,
regarding nmu: gtk+3.0_3.8.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
723953: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723953
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Please schedule a binNMU for gtk+3.0 so the -udeb gets a proper depdency
on libatk-bridge2.0-0-udeb, which has been added in the mean time.
nmu gtk+3.0_3.8.4-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libatk-bridge2.0-0-udeb.
Closes: #723557"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 17:47:53 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Michael Biebl <[email protected]> (2013-09-21):
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: [email protected]
> > Usertags: binnmu
> >
> > Please schedule a binNMU for gtk+3.0 so the -udeb gets a proper depdency
> > on libatk-bridge2.0-0-udeb, which has been added in the mean time.
> >
> > nmu gtk+3.0_3.8.4-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against libatk-bridge2.0-0-udeb.
> > Closes: #723557"
>
> FWIW, while it shouldn't hurt to get that fixed, that won't be
> sufficient for it to be installable just yet, because of #723948
> which I've just filed.
>
Should be good enough to have that fixed with the next upload then. d-i
doesn't yet use gtk3 anyway.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
