On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 06:22:43PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> On 01-10-13 00:54, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > * user-accessible interfaces (GUI, stdin, stdout, stderr, command line,
> >   reading/writing plain-text files) should be able to pass through UTF-8
> >   data uncorrupted, by default
> > * UTF-8 should be properly displayed
> 
> I am wondering who is going to do the work for e.g. bug 576095 [1].
> Upstream is basically dead and declared in the past that UTF-8 support
> would mean a mayor effort (the e-mail archive I refer to in the bug got
> lost). I am not going to do it as my c skills are not up to it. So what
> do you propose in view of this release goal? That packages such as nedit
> are removed from Debian? Apparently [2], there are still users
> interested in this package, that is why I never removed it.
> 
> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576095
> [2] http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=nedit

  Simply stating in the package description that it doesn't support UTF-8
seems more acceptable to me. That a package doesn't met a RG doesn't exclude
it from Debian¹, nevertheless it's good to know what to expect from it.

  regards,

¹https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals
-- 
  Ricardo Mones 
  ~
  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.          Carl Sagan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to