On 2013-10-29 00:52, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:09:44PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Dear maintainers of libfso-glib and fso-gsmd, >> >> I have noticed that libfso-glib and fso-gsmd have started a transition >> and they seem to have been "left to rot" in unstable. My issue here is >> that they are keeping at least 4 RC bug fixes out of testing at the >> moment[1]. >> >> The situation (as far as I can understand it) is that: >> >> libfso-glib dropped libfso-glib1 in favor of libfso-glib2 > > Right. API/ABI has changed. > >> fso-gsmd dropped fso-gsmd-ezx, fso-gsmd-gta04, fso-gsmd-htc >> and fso-gsmd-openmoko > > This is not completly correct. fso-gsmd just dropped useless > architectures. These packages were arch any before, but are > specific to the arm devices. >
Seems like I overlooked that part, sorry. >> [...] > > I think the correct solution is to remove fso-gsmd-ezx, fso-gsmd-gta04 > and fso-gsmd-openmoko only for the unsupported architectures. This > should solve the problem. Still supported architectures are: > > fso-gsmd-ezx => armel > fso-gsmd-gta04 => armel, armhf > fso-gsmd-openmoko => armel > > -- Sebastian > By the looks of it, you will have to file a bug report for the fso-gsmd binaries as they do not appear in the cruft report[1]. ~Niels [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/526f5469.30...@thykier.net