Your message dated Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:26:46 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#728992: nmu: smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #728992,
regarding nmu: smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
728992: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728992
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
In the following days (after some more testing), I'm planning to do a
new libselinux upload that reverts the patch that was fixing #728529 as
it was refused by upstream and I don't want to carry that patch in
Debian forever.
Rebuilding smartmontools against the up coming libselinux upload is
equally fixing this ld.so assertion.
I'm not too sure what's the root cause of this bug, I think that #728529
should be reassign to eglibc package.
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
nmu smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild after libselinux has
dropped -lpthread"
dw smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1 . ALL . -m 'libselinux1-dev (>= 2.2.1-1)'
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.11-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2013-11-07 18:24, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi,
>
> In the following days (after some more testing), I'm planning to do a
> new libselinux upload that reverts the patch that was fixing #728529 as
> it was refused by upstream and I don't want to carry that patch in
> Debian forever.
>
> Rebuilding smartmontools against the up coming libselinux upload is
> equally fixing this ld.so assertion.
>
> I'm not too sure what's the root cause of this bug, I think that #728529
> should be reassign to eglibc package.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Laurent Bigonville
>
>
> nmu smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild after libselinux has
> dropped -lpthread"
> dw smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1 . ALL . -m 'libselinux1-dev (>= 2.2.1-1)'
>
> [...]
Scheduled for linux architectures[1]. Thanks for the heads up.
~Niels
[1] On the basis that libselinux is linux-any, so smartmontools on the
rest of the architectures should be unaffected. If this assertion is
wrong, please do let me know and I will schedule a binNMU for the 3
remaining architectures.
--- End Message ---
