On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:24:40PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 03:13 +0400, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote: > > Usertags: unblock > Nope. Unblock implies unstable to testing transition.
Sorry. > > This version fixes important regression in wheezy (#726529) for > > ipv6-enabled hosts, which may break Apache's access control directives. > > The version information for that bug report indicates that it affects > the package in testing and unstable as well. Is that correct? If it is, > then please fix it in unstable first; if it's not, please fix the > metadata. Yes, this affects unstable. And I don't see before about requirements for testing in sid. See checklist from http://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-updates.html: * the fixes for the bugs have been *thoroughly tested* at least in sid In this case, I think this was thoroughly tested by me and bug submitters (see #726529 and #734798) Now updated package enter sid, when you can consider this fix to be tested enough? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
