Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:21:55 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#719227: transition: poppler 0.22
has caused the Debian Bug report #719227,
regarding transition: poppler 0.22
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
719227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=719227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 679896 719224 712688
Hi,
I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.22.x transition.
Currently there is Poppler 0.22.x in experimental already. Please note
that there are still few issues that prevents it to be started,
so I'm filing this at this time to have this transition considered
by the release team.
This transition impacts the existing poppler libraries in the following ways:
- libpoppler19 → libpoppler37
- libpoppler-glib8 -- BC with 0.18;
provides symbols file (with few new symbols though)
- libpoppler-qt4-3 → libpoppler-qt4-4
Below it is a list of sources which are touched by the transition, and their
situation, sorted by solutions:
Sources that compile fine, and can be binNMU'ed:
calligra (poppler, poppler-qt4)
comparepdf (poppler-qt4)
cups-filters (poppler)
diffpdf (poppler-qt4)
gambas3 (poppler)
gdcm (poppler)
gnome-commander (poppler)
inkscape (poppler)
katarakt (poppler-qt4)
kbibtex (poppler-qt4)
ktikz (poppler-qt4)
libreoffice (poppler)
luatex (poppler)
nepomuk-core (poppler-qt4)
okular (poppler-qt4)
pdf2djvu (poppler)
pdftoipe (poppler)
popplerkit.framework (poppler)
prerex (poppler-qt4)
python-poppler-qt4 (poppler-qt4)
qcomicbook (poppler-qt4)
qpdfview (poppler-qt4)
tellico (poppler-qt4)
texlive-bin (poppler)
texmaker (poppler-qt4)
texstudio (poppler-qt4)
texworks (poppler-qt4)
Sources that currently FTBFS:
* gdal (poppler)
gdal currently in unstable FTBFS with new Poppler (#679887), while
the version in experimental builds fine.
OTOH, gdal/experimental needs a transition (#712688).
* xpdf (poppler)
The patches needed to compile with poppler 0.22.x are not compatible
with poppler 0.18, so they cannot be uploaded to unstable right now.
They are #679896 (for 0.18 → 0.20) and #719224 (for 0.20 → 0.22).
Other cases:
* derivations (poppler)
This source builds a libpoppler-based utility application which is
only used during the build to generate other data, and no trace of
that application are left in the resulting arch:all package.
It currently FTBFS with Poppler >= 0.20 (#690161), but given what
said above it can be left out of the transition (the bug severity
will be raised to "serious" once the transition starts).
I grouped all the bugs mentioned above (even the solved ones) with the
following usertag:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=poppler-0.20
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[email protected];tag=poppler-0.22
A ben tracker for poppler would have:
title = "poppler 0.22";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ "libpoppler-private-dev" | .build-depends ~
"libpoppler-qt4-dev";
is_good = .depends ~ "libpoppler37" | .depends ~ "libpoppler-qt4-4";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpoppler19" | .depends ~ "libpoppler-qt4-3";
Thanks,
--
Pino
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 15:45:19 +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: transition
> Control: block -1 by 679896 719224 712688
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to ask a slot for a Poppler 0.22.x transition.
> Currently there is Poppler 0.22.x in experimental already. Please note
> that there are still few issues that prevents it to be started,
> so I'm filing this at this time to have this transition considered
> by the release team.
>
All done now.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
