Your message dated Mon, 31 Mar 2014 00:43:48 +0200 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Re: auto-removals: No notication to rdeps when they are in danger has caused the Debian Bug report #734396, regarding auto-removals: No notication to rdeps when they are in danger to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 734396: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734396 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: serious Control: owner -1 ! When a package with reverse dependencies are considered for auto-removal, the maintainers of receive dependencies do not receive a notication. This is a problem because these maintainers are then surprised when their package is suddenly removed "without notice"[1]. We need to ensure that maintainers of reverse dependencies receive adequate notice of the pending removal of their package. Having reflected a bit on the issue after it was mentioned on IRC, I consider the lack of this notication severe enough that we should consider temporarily suspending non-leaf / recursive removals until resolved. However, I believe the "leaf-removal" case to have sufficient notication (the RC bug itself being that notice). That said, I would still welcome them receiving a reminder when their package is put on the auto-removal list. The best suggestion I heard so far is mailing ${package}@packages.d.o, when the package appears on the auto-removal list. It would definitely be a "push"-notication and it was considered sufficient by the maintainers when we did these removals manually. ~Niels [1] I am well aware of the auto-removal data sources and the UDD bugs cgi script, but it is "pull" rather than "push" notication. Even if #727048 was resolved, I am not sure it counts as "push" - although, it would definitely improve the situation.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi Niels, On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote: > When a package with reverse dependencies are considered for > auto-removal, the maintainers of receive dependencies do not receive a > notication. Maintainers now get notifications for auto-removals. Recursive auto-removals are active again. Cheers, Ivo
--- End Message ---
