On Mon, 2013-07-01 at 00:01 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Maybe we can revisit this for the next oldstable update. > There was no feedback from the maintainers, but Pierre Ynard (the > reporter of #543163) confirmed (see #687761) that he once had a working > squeeze setup with lvm2 and no udev by removing the initscript > dependency. (He is tracking unstable nowadays and needs/needed some more > changes for getting modules loaded, but that's the price for not using > udev - and seems to be due to his special hardware setup.) > > This change to the initscript won't change anything for existing squeeze > installations - either they already have lvm2 + udev installed or > manually changed the conffiles to allow lvm2 without udev. > But it would simplify my work running (sometimes weird :-) upgrade tests > to find "interesting" corner cases - lvm2 has a large rdep tree > requiring a lot of workarounds ...
"The next oldstable update" is now the final update for squeeze. Is this still an issue in practical terms? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
