Your message dated Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:09:00 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#753079: transition: librime
has caused the Debian Bug report #753079,
regarding transition: librime
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
753079: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753079
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
We're planning to upload a new version of librime, which has ABI/API
breaks. The affected packages are few, and all under IME team's
maintenance, and we're mostly ready to have sourceful upload for
these packages:
Source: fcitx-rime
Source: ibus-rime
Ben file:
title = "librime";
is_affected = .depends ~ "librime0" | .depends ~ "librime1";
is_good = .depends ~ "librime1";
is_bad = .depends ~ "librime0";
Regards,
Yixuan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/07/14 18:44, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 11/07/14 17:08, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 06:12:18PM -0400, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 3:50 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 03/07/14 21:36, Guo Yixuan wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Osamu Aoki <[email protected]>
>>>>>> I will upload new git head when prompted. Is it ready?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, it is. (I just noticed you already uploaded it. Thanks a lot!)
>>>>
>>>> And it has failed on armel because of #727621.
>>>
>>> Thank you for noting this. It seems to be a rather difficult bug in gcc.
>>
>> Thanks from me too.
>>
>> But this seems toi be a bug porter amd GCC maintainer has to address.
>> If they can not, we should drop armel from Debian.
>>
>> Unless we get some workaround patch, this is not something we can do
>> much about.
>
> In the case of librime, the rdeps (fcitx-rime and ibus-rime) have never been
> built on armel. So you can ask for the removal of the outdated librime armel
> binaries (through a bug against ftp.debian.org) and then librime would be able
> to migrate. And when the armel issue is fixed and librime builds there, those
> binaries will migrate automatically.
>
> Or you can make librime build on armel, like you mentioned in another mail.
> That
> would of course be preferred.
The latter happened, everything migrated.
Closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
