Your message dated Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:05:15 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#758249: transition: liblas
has caused the Debian Bug report #758249,
regarding transition: liblas
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
758249: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=758249
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
Dear Release Team,
In the Debian GIS Team we would like to start a mini-transition for
liblas. Even though it is small, a binNMU will be required and we feel
it would be a good idea to check with you about the timing.
liblas (1.8.0) is available in experimental
pktools (2.5.3) is about to be uploaded to unstable and has been tested
and confirmed to build successfully against liblas 1.8.0. Pktools 2.5.3
also contains a fix to get it building on arm*.
The transition has been automatically detected:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
We may get caught up in the perl 5.20 transition (causing a pause in the
middle), but in any case we believe the steps should be:
1) Wait for pktools 2.5.3 to migrate to testing
2) Verify that pktools built successfully on arm*
3) Move libLAS 1.8.0 from experimental to unstable
4) Verify that liblas has built on all architectures
5) binNMU pktools
Would it be okay to go ahead with this in the next few days?
Regards,
Ross
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 16/08/14 00:50, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 15/08/14 22:04, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: [email protected]
>> Usertags: transition
>> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
>>
>> Dear Release Team,
>>
>> In the Debian GIS Team we would like to start a mini-transition for
>> liblas. Even though it is small, a binNMU will be required and we feel
>> it would be a good idea to check with you about the timing.
>>
>> liblas (1.8.0) is available in experimental
>>
>> pktools (2.5.3) is about to be uploaded to unstable and has been tested
>> and confirmed to build successfully against liblas 1.8.0. Pktools 2.5.3
>> also contains a fix to get it building on arm*.
>>
>> The transition has been automatically detected:
>> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-liblas.html
>>
>> We may get caught up in the perl 5.20 transition (causing a pause in the
>> middle), but in any case we believe the steps should be:
>>
>> 1) Wait for pktools 2.5.3 to migrate to testing
>> 2) Verify that pktools built successfully on arm*
>> 3) Move libLAS 1.8.0 from experimental to unstable
>> 4) Verify that liblas has built on all architectures
>> 5) binNMU pktools
>>
>> Would it be okay to go ahead with this in the next few days?
>
> Yes. Go ahead whenever you're ready.
It just entered testing. Closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
