Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2014 09:46:39 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#760124: nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9923-3, 
libpar-packer-perl_1.019-1, libverilog-perl_3.404-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #760124,
regarding nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9923-3, libpar-packer-perl_1.019-1, 
libverilog-perl_3.404-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
760124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], 
[email protected]

At least three packages were built partly without hardened LDFLAGS in
the Perl 5.20 transition because of #758471. This should be fixed in
5.20.0-6, so could you please binNMU the known ones?

nmu libwx-perl_1:0.9923-3      . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
#758471)"
nmu libpar-packer-perl_1.019-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
#758471)"
nmu libverilog-perl_3.404-1    . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
#758471)"

(I haven't listed the "dw" lines: I understand a dep-wait doesn't
 guarantee the newer perl is installed on the buildds, and something
 called "extra-depends" is needed instead, but I don't quite know the
 syntax. Perhaps you could enlighten me?)
-- 
Niko Tyni   [email protected]

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 01/09/14 03:40, Niko Tyni wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], 
> [email protected]
> 
> At least three packages were built partly without hardened LDFLAGS in
> the Perl 5.20 transition because of #758471. This should be fixed in
> 5.20.0-6, so could you please binNMU the known ones?
> 
> nmu libwx-perl_1:0.9923-3      . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
> #758471)"

Scheduled.

> nmu libpar-packer-perl_1.019-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
> #758471)"

A new version was just uploaded, so a rebuild is happening already.

> nmu libverilog-perl_3.404-1    . ALL . -m "rebuild with hardened LDFLAGS (see 
> #758471)"

Scheduled.

> (I haven't listed the "dw" lines: I understand a dep-wait doesn't
>  guarantee the newer perl is installed on the buildds, and something
>  called "extra-depends" is needed instead, but I don't quite know the
>  syntax. Perhaps you could enlighten me?)

All the buildds should be upgraded to perl 5.20 by now, so that shouldn't be
necessary. Anyway, the syntax looks like:

nmu libunicode-linebreak-perl . ALL . --extra-depends 'perl-base (>= 5.20)' -m
"Rebuild against perlapi-5.20.0."

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to