On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 21:32 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Alternatively you might be well advised to verify whether the affected > file is not even needed in ctn 2.30.0. As I said it is not used at all > in 2.32.1 and may be this is even valid in the previous version. This > would be the most simple solution - but I'm personally lacking imaging > skills and feel not able to help here in a sensinble time frame.
That "sensible" time frame would have to be very quick indeed. The window for getting fixes in to the next point release closed yesterday. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
