On 2014-10-29 21:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > [...] >> Hi Andreas, >> >> Sorry, but I will have to decline your request for an unblock of >> camitk/3.4.0-1. Sadly, the changes between the current version of >> camitk in testing and camitk/3.4.0-1 are /not/ compatible with our >> freeze guidelines. > > I might have missunderstood the announcement[1]. Can you give an > example case when asking for reducing the testing migration time to 5 > days is appropriate? >
Certainly. It was primarily intended for security fixes or (to some extend) RC bugs, where a forced 10-day migration would/might do more harm than good. >> While I certainly appreciate many of the arguments (especially the >> focus on more automated testing and it coming from upstream), we did set >> a deadline for including arbitrary changes and your upload of >> camitk/3.4.0-1 seems to have missed said deadline. > > I'm aware that we missed the deadline for a 10 day migration. I > obviously missed the point of the announcement[1]. Sorry about this > but some clarification would be great. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/10/msg00001.html > I hope you found it the example clarifying. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
