On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 12:39:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Ahhh, well. I confirm that the 0.10-2 changes need to be taken into > consideration now as well. I admit I do not have any personal interest > in blitz++. The only reason why I spent some time into it was that > years ago somebody asked me for help in this package and now it seems to > bit-rot while it has some users.
If it's not actually maintained, we shouldn't ship it in stable, IMO. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
