Your message dated Sun, 09 Nov 2014 14:15:37 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#768822: unblock: chiark-tcl/1.1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768822,
regarding unblock: chiark-tcl/1.1.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
768822: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768822
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package chiark-tcl
The current version in testing, 1.1.1+nmu1, FTBFS on all architectures
(due to changes in Linux kernel headers). 1.1.2 fixes this.
1.1.2 still doesn't build on non-Linux architectures. I have _not_
fixed that because I thought you probably wouldn't appreciate it.
Source and binary debdiffs are below.
unblock chiark-tcl/1.1.2
Thanks,
Ian.
diff -Nru chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/debian/changelog
chiark-tcl-1.1.2/debian/changelog
--- chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/debian/changelog 2013-10-15 18:14:12.000000000
+0100
+++ chiark-tcl-1.1.2/debian/changelog 2014-11-09 12:53:58.000000000 +0000
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+chiark-tcl (1.1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * tuntap: Use <net/if.h> not <linux/if.h>. Closes:#768766. (FTBFS)
+ * Build-Depends: move tcl-dev to the end, so that we prefer tcl8.4-dev.
+ This is necessary because we want to build against tcl8.4 in jessie
+ to avoid requiring a newer Tcl ABI.
+ * Reintroduce .gitignore which a build tool brokenly deleted.
+ * Remove .cvsignore files from git repo.
+
+ -- Ian Jackson <[email protected]> Sun, 09 Nov 2014 12:44:18
+0000
+
chiark-tcl (1.1.1+nmu1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/debian/control chiark-tcl-1.1.2/debian/control
--- chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/debian/control 2013-10-03 10:52:19.000000000
+0100
+++ chiark-tcl-1.1.2/debian/control 2014-11-09 12:33:35.000000000 +0000
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Priority: optional
Section: interpreters
Standards-Version: 3.9.1
-Build-Depends: libadns1-dev (>= 1.2), nettle-dev, libcdb-dev | tinycdb (<=
0.75), tcl-dev | tcl8.4-dev | tcl8.3-dev | tcl8.2-dev, debhelper (>= 5)
+Build-Depends: libadns1-dev (>= 1.2), nettle-dev, libcdb-dev | tinycdb (<=
0.75), tcl8.4-dev | tcl8.3-dev | tcl8.2-dev | tcl-dev, debhelper (>= 5)
Package: libtcl-chiark-1
Architecture: any
diff -Nru chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/.gitignore chiark-tcl-1.1.2/.gitignore
--- chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/.gitignore 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
+++ chiark-tcl-1.1.2/.gitignore 2014-11-09 12:16:50.000000000 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+*~
+*.o
+*.so
+*.d
+*+tcmdif.[ch]
+debian/files
+debian/libtcl-chiark-1
+debian/libtcl-chiark-1.debhelper.log
+debian/libtcl-chiark-1.*.debhelper
+debian/libtcl-chiark-1.substvars
diff -Nru chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/tuntap/chiark_tcl_tuntap.h
chiark-tcl-1.1.2/tuntap/chiark_tcl_tuntap.h
--- chiark-tcl-1.1.1+nmu1/tuntap/chiark_tcl_tuntap.h 2012-06-02
12:11:08.000000000 +0100
+++ chiark-tcl-1.1.2/tuntap/chiark_tcl_tuntap.h 2014-11-09 12:22:13.000000000
+0000
@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <sys/ioctl.h>
-#include <linux/if.h>
+
+#include <net/if.h>
#include <linux/if_tun.h>
#include "hbytes.h"
File lists identical (after any substitutions)
Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------
Installed-Size: [-228-] {+241+}
Version: [-1.1.1+nmu1-] {+1.1.2+}
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2014-11-09 14:00, Ian Jackson wrote:
Please unblock package chiark-tcl
The current version in testing, 1.1.1+nmu1, FTBFS on all architectures
(due to changes in Linux kernel headers). 1.1.2 fixes this.
Unblocked, thanks.
1.1.2 still doesn't build on non-Linux architectures. I have _not_
fixed that because I thought you probably wouldn't appreciate it.
Indeed.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
