On 2014-11-11 19:24, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Daniel Pocock's message of 2014-11-11 00:59:36 -0800: >> On 11/11/14 06:05, Clint Byrum wrote: >>> [...] >>> I think we should unblock 0.9.1. >> >> Release team have been a bit reluctant to unblock whole new versions >> without any justification at all >> >> In this case though, maybe they can accept that there was a good reason >> why it wasn't in testing before the freeze: >> >> [...] > > The upload only missed being in testing by 3 days, and fixes a number > of issues. We don't want to ship with an old API. Seems like an easy > unblock this early in the freeze. >
Honestly, no - the arguments present are really not all that interesting. In fact, they are a-dime-a-dozen right now. In particular, my argument for rejecting pynag/0.9.1 is that the diff is simply too large to reasonably comprehend. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
