Hi Frederic-Emmanuel, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (30 Oct 2014 18:28:58 GMT) : > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:19:36PM +0000, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: >> I would say that 251 and 221 deserve an upgrade of both package. >> >> Do you need more informations ?
> I think what Adam meant was that with no release team relationship with > upstream, no prior knowledge of the code, no Debian bugs and just a bunch > of links to upstream bug reports, we have absolutely no way to assess the > impact of: > 49 files changed, 745 insertions(+), 190 deletions(-) (taurus) > 43 files changed, 684 insertions(+), 580 deletions(-) (sardana) > That's where you come in. You're the maintainer and the expert in this > package. Are 251 and 221 that common and important that the other > changes are worth less testing than usual? Ping? Cheers, -- intrigeri -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
