Your message dated Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:37:42 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#770728: unblock: ruby-em-hiredis/0.2.1-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #770728,
regarding unblock: ruby-em-hiredis/0.2.1-2.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
770728: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package ruby-em-hiredis
The previous version was removed due to a FTBFS caused by some
tests requiring the lo interface to exist. The new version disables
these tests.
This package is a dependecy of ruby-em-synchrony, which is a build
dependency of ruby-faraday, currently FTBFSing because of this
removal.
I'm attaching the debdiff of the fixed version.
unblock ruby-em-hiredis/0.2.1-2.1
--
Cheers,
Marga
ruby-em-hiredirs.debdiff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 18:23 +0100, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> This package is a dependecy of ruby-em-synchrony, which is a build
> >> dependency of ruby-faraday, currently FTBFSing because of this
> >> removal.
> >
> > Unblocking this package won't make -synchrony eligible for migration,
> > however. Was that an intended (but not stated) effect of this request?
>
> Yes, sorry, I'm new to the unblocking process, I thought I would file
> a separate unblock for -synchrony if this one got approved. If they
> should be unblocked together, then I guess the request should have
> been:
>
> unblock ruby-em-hiredis/0.2.1-2.1
> unblock ruby-em-synchrony/1.0.3-1
No problem. They don't necessarily have to be done together, just that a
-hiredis unblock won't actually fix anything on its own. :-)
Having looked at the diff and the point where the packages were removed
from testing, I've added the unblock hints; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---