Your message dated Wed, 26 Nov 2014 19:49:20 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#771094: nmu: plastimatch_1.5.16+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #771094,
regarding nmu: plastimatch_1.5.16+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
771094: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771094
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu plastimatch_1.5.16+dfsg-2 . ALL -amd64 -arm64 -hurd-i386 -i386 -ppc64el .
-m "Rebuild against new libinsighttoolkit3-dev"
This is needed to resolve #769975.
Thank you,
Greg
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 12:18 -0500, Gregory Sharp wrote:
> nmu plastimatch_1.5.16+dfsg-2 . ALL -amd64 -arm64 -hurd-i386 -i386 -ppc64el .
> -m "Rebuild against new libinsighttoolkit3-dev"
>
> This is needed to resolve #769975.
Nope.
A binNMU is a new version of a package, whereas what you want is for a
failed build to be retried. That's called a give-back and should be
addressed to [email protected] and/or [email protected].
I've given plastimatch back on the affected architectures, but please
bear this in mind for future requests.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
