On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:00:03 +0100 Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> wrote: > (Putting on my d-i RM fedora.) > > #768876 is tagged jessie-ignore so I'm really unconvinced by the > debian/rules changes. > > At this stage, I'd rather see the security fix only.
Wouldn't that entail that #769190 would NOT be fixed for jessie? I realize that important != RC, but a not properly working busybox-static in jessie would be a real bummer (imo). Cheers, Diederik -- GPG: 0x138E41915C7EFED6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
