Hi, On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 07:09:58PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Attached is a new version of the patch with the dependency on libc6-dev > replaced by > libc6-dev [!alpha !ia64 !hurd-i386] | libc0.3-dev [hurd-i386] | > libc6.1-dev [alpha ia64] | libc-dev > (as used by build-essential).
hurd-i386 doesn't make sense for a linux-any package. alpha is not a release architecture in wheezy. So I think this could be simplified as "libc6-dev [!ia64] | libc6.1-dev [ia64]". I wonder if the single provider of libc-dev would just be picked correctly if that'd be used. Assuming that you tested that in a minimal chroot and that this is sufficient vs. build-essential, I'd be inclined to approve the upload. Kind regards Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
