Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:20:40 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#769784: unblock: carmetal/3.5.2+dfsg-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #769784,
regarding unblock: carmetal/3.5.2+dfsg-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
769784: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769784
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package carmetal
The RC bugs targetting this package have been fixed
-------source debdiff----8<-----------------------
diff -Nru carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog
carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2011-03-10 15:09:26.000000000
+0100
+++ carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2014-11-10 18:38:08.000000000
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,17 @@
+carmetal (3.5.2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * upgraded Standards-Version to 3.9.6
+ * removed the --with quilt clauses from debian/rules
+ * removed --with clauses after commands like dh_auto_clean which ignore
+ this switch; added jh_* scripts in place.
+ * removed 'jh_depends --jvm="open sun6"' from debian/rules.
+ Closes: #753787
+ * checked that the package can be built and is working inside debian/sid.
+ Closes: #552990; Closes: #577119
+
+ -- Georges Khaznadar <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:58:38 +0100
+
carmetal (3.5.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release
diff -Nru carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control
--- carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control 2011-03-10 15:36:28.000000000 +0100
+++ carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control 2014-11-10 17:58:16.000000000 +0100
@@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
Section: math
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Yves Combe <[email protected]>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), javahelper (>= 0.32), quilt (>=
0.46-7~), ant, ant-optional, docbook-to-man, rhino
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), javahelper (>= 0.32),
+ quilt (>= 0.46-7~), ant, ant-optional, docbook-to-man, rhino
Build-Depends-Indep: default-jdk
-Standards-Version: 3.9.1
+Standards-Version: 3.9.6
Package: carmetal
Architecture: all
diff -Nru carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules
--- carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules 2011-03-10 15:06:53.000000000 +0100
+++ carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules 2014-11-10 18:07:09.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,17 +6,19 @@
export CLASSPATH=js.jar
%:
- dh --with javahelper,quilt $@
+ dh --with javahelper $@
override_dh_auto_build:
- dh_auto_build --with javahelper,quilt
+ dh_auto_build
+ jh_clean
docbook-to-man debian/carmetal.sgml > debian/carmetal.1
override_dh_auto_clean:
- dh_auto_clean --with javahelper,quilt
+ dh_auto_clean
+ jh_clean
rm -f debian/carmetal.1
override_jh_manifest:
-override_jh_depends:
- jh_depends --jvm="open sun6"
+#override_jh_depends:
+# jh_depends --jvm="open sun6"
-----------------------8<-----------------------
Please,
unblock carmetal/3.5.2+dfsg-1.1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (650, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (1,
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 04:21:41PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
> Dear Adam,
>
> I already replied this e-mail the 16th November, however I replied only
> to Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]>, not adding
> [email protected] to the recipient list.
Ah, that's fallen through the floorboards then. Sorry I didn't spot it.
> Please find attached the previous e-mail.
>
> I repeat here my argument:
> I am using carmetal in my high school, like some of my colleagues too.
>
> As Yves Combe did not reply, how can I take politely the reponsibility
> of that package?
If you're prepared to take responsibility for it in Jessie, I'll unblock it
(doing so now). The polite way to take over the package in general is to do
useful work through NMUs, and at some point add yourself to Uploaders. The
current maintainer may become more responsive in future, he could just be
having a busy time.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
