On 2014-12-16 06:22, Guillem Jover wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: [email protected] > Usertags: unblock > Control: block -1 by 770627 > > Hi! > > I'd like to upload dpkg 1.17.23 with the following changes. I've > excluded and filtered translation changes. I'm including a patch series > instead of a debdiff, because it should be clearer and easier to spot > specific changes you might not want to approve? >
Hi, Thanks, the changes look reasonable. It > I'd prefer if 1.17.22 could be unblocked before uploading this, because > that version is way better than the one currently in testing, and it is > causing fewer upgrade issues. Otherwise I'll just merge both unblock > requests. > Apologies, but I am not entirely convinced here. I would strongly prefer /not/ having trigger regressions right now. In fact, I am honestly considering to request having the trigger change reverted if 1.17.23 does not solve the issues without introduce another regression. We are one and a half month into the freeze and we still do not have a clean upgrade path on a package level. I am deeply concerned that we have been missing out on (e.g.) the systemd upgrade reports because of this. > I've delayed a bit the request because there are still some packages > with trigger cycles that have not been uploaded yet, I can start taking > a look on delayed NMUs and wait for those or upload .23 right away and > possibly prepare a .24 with those additional versioned Breaks, whichever > you prefer. > It seems that only gxine and icecc are missing now. If so, please go ahead with the .23 with versioned breaks for them as well. Worst case, I will have them removed from testing - best case, they will be fixed. I will take the political fall-out of this and notify the maintainers of the affected packages. Let me know if I missed any packages. > I've also not added the --force-configure-any default switch, because we > don't really know what happened with apt and dbus there, and if apt from > stable is affected or not. Given the recent dpkg, apt, and dbus changes > I think I'd rather let this as is, and wait in case it shows up again, > which should give us more information (due to the new apt not eating > dpkg's output). > Noted, though I sincerely hope it is fixed. I /might/ be convinced to accept a .24 for this particular issue. > Here's the full tentative changelog (with the translation changes > already in master): > > ,--- > [...] > `--- > > Thanks, > Guillem > Apologies for the less optimistic view on my end and thanks for your work. ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
