Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: [email protected] Usertags: binnmu
Dear release team, My earlier binNMU in wheezy-security wasn't appropriate, but binutils-mingw-w64 still needs fixing in jessie and sid, and I'm wondering whether to do sourceful uploads or request binNMUs. If binNMUs are OK, there won't be any trouble with inappropriate versions of binutils-source ending up being used in jessie; otherwise I suppose I'll need to do a source upload to jessie-p-u (so it picks up binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1 from jessie) as well as sid (which will pick up binutils 2.25-3)... nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for DSA-2013-2 (CVE-2014-8484, CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503, CVE-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738)." nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . jessie-proposed-updates . -m "Rebuild for DSA-2013-2 (CVE-2014-8484, CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503, CVE-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738)." Regards, Stephen -- System Information: Debian Release: 8.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
