> From aa57d3cc600de9d9ff3e318dc4beed33cfcfd9f3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Cyril Brulebois <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 11:29:36 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] Document the jessie branching. > > --- > debian/changelog | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog > index e78827c..7c18a73 100644 > --- a/debian/changelog > +++ b/debian/changelog > @@ -1,7 +1,13 @@ > -busybox (1:1.22.0-10) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > +busybox (1:1.22.0-14+deb8u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > + [ Michael Tokarev ] > * lzop-add-overflow-check-CVE-2014-4607.patch (Closes: #768945) > > + [ Cyril Brulebois ] > + * Branch jessie from master to only include the security fix; other changes > + between 1:1.22.0-9 and 1:1.22.0-14 are invasive and not needed for > jessie. > + Cheat a bit with the revision number to avoid bumping the epoch.
So you're continuing to ruin my (hard in this case) work, spreading lies (invasive) and confirming you're against others working on debian. That's fine with me too. I can continue maintain local copy of busybox the same way as I did before I took over its maintenance, because in debian it was in *awful* state and mostly unusable. (For the record: all the recent changes I made in busybox is needed for jessie, I especially and carefully selected the minimal set. We had it in broken state for too long.) Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
