Control: tags -1 moreinfo On 2015-02-16 17:16, Martin Pitt wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: [email protected] > Usertags: unblock > > systemd 215-12 hit unstable three days ago with some RC/important/safe > So far there have been no regression reports. At the time of this > writing there are now no RC bugs left \o/ > > [...]
Hi Martin, I have not had time to review this fully. However, I noticed #778565, which suggests a regression in this version of udev. I am putting this unblock request on hold until you have had a time to review #778565. > > While you are at it, would you mind having a look at #755722? I'd be > interested in your opinion whether for jessie we should (1) ignore the > problem, (2) apply the sysv behaviour compatible hwclock.service, or > (3) boldly go and enable timesyncd. > > Thanks, > > Martin > > unblock systemd/215-12 > Personally, I am leaning towards (2) in the absence of a patch/diff for (3). Though, as I understood the link to the upstream date, part of the reason for not sync'ing the time was to make it easier on live-CDs. Is this the sort of change that will break live-CDs? If so, what will it take to "not break" live-CDs with (2) (or possibly (3)). Thanks, ~Niels -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
