Your message dated Sun, 26 Apr 2015 13:19:43 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#773972: please binNMU packages to build with binutils
2.25
has caused the Debian Bug report #773972,
regarding please binNMU packages to build with binutils 2.25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
773972: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773972
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
please binNMU the following packages to build with binutils (>= 2.25-3).
ggcov, tulip, lush, binutils-arm-none-eabi, binutils-mingw-w64, binutils-z80,
cross-binutils, openbios, openhackware.
I'm unsure about binutils-mingw-w64. Stephen said that this package would
require a sourceful upload.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:58:26PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> please binNMU the following packages to build with binutils (>= 2.25-3).
>
> ggcov, tulip, lush, binutils-arm-none-eabi, binutils-mingw-w64, binutils-z80,
> cross-binutils, openbios, openhackware.
I *think* this was done at the time; if you disagree please reopen.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
