Your message dated Thu, 14 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#784724: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #784724,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
784724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)
Ben file:
title = "gloox";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgloox12" | .depends ~ "libgloox13";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgloox13";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgloox12";
Regards,
Vincent
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.18-3-vclaptop-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-05-09 09:18, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <[email protected]>
wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On 2015-05-08 04:16, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a
relatively
small
transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds
against
newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):
licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)
Please go ahead.
Uploaded to sid and now built on all archs. Thanks in advance for
scheduling binNMUs!
The transition completed last night.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
--- End Message ---
