On 15/05/15 16:30, Sebastian Dröge wrote: > Hi Emilio, > > I indeed forgot that, sorry! > > On Fr, 2015-05-15 at 16:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Hi Sebastian, >> >> There's an uncoordinated transition for libvpx in unstable. I suppose you >> didn't >> remember the soname had changed when re-uploading to unstable now that the >> freeze is over. It affects a few of packages and I do wonder whether the >> rdeps >> will build just fine or not. I saw this[1] and shows that a few symbols were >> removed, but I don't know if that affects our rdeps. > > All recent rdeps should build fine against the new version of the > library. The removed symbols shouldn't be used by anything (at least I'm > not aware of any user), the bigger problem is that some compatibility > #defines disappeared from the headers. > > But I expect everything recent to build just fine. The only thing that > probably doesn't is gst-plugins-bad0.10, but that one should really just > die and disappear from the archive. > >> Can you check if the rdeps are fine, so we can schedule binNMUs if >> appropriate? > > Please schedule binNMUs for everything except gst-plugins-bad0.10, that > will have to be patched a little. If any of the binNMUs fails for > whatever reason, patching the packages should be a matter of sed (I'll > check then).
Great, I have scheduled the binNMUs. Let's see how things go. Thanks, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
