On 05/03/15 22:45, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: [email protected] > Usertags: binnmu > > Hi, > > as I saw binutils_2.25-5 got unblocked, I was wondering weather the > binutils-* packages built from binutils-source should be rebuilt > aginst the new version targeting Jessie? > > There are binutils-{z80,mingw-w64,arm-none-eabi} currently in the > archive and built against older versions of binutils (cf. [1]). > > The gcc-{arm-non-eabi,mingw-w64} packages are in the same situation, > so are gdb-{arm-none-eabi,avr,mingw-w64} (though for some of the > latter only the Debian revision of gdb changed). > > Finally there's also gnat-4.9. > > nmu binutils-z80_4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5." > nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5." > nmu binutils-arm-none-eabi_5 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5."
These three happened in time for jessie. gnat-4.9 didn't. It was built against gcc-4.9_4.9.2-2, but we only ship gcc4-.9_4.9.2-10 in stable AFAICS. That seems odd. I haven't checked gcc-*. Is this such an issue that we should do the binNMUs for stable? Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
