Your message dated Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:40:39 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#786466: transition: ffms2
has caused the Debian Bug report #786466,
regarding transition: ffms2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
786466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
libffms2 bumped its SONAME to libffms2-4 and requires a transition. All three
reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.
x264 is one the reverse dependencies and is also waiting for a transition slot.
Maybe we can do these two transitions together?
Ben file:
title = "ffms2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libffms2-3" | .depends ~ "libffms2-4";
is_good = .depends ~ "libffms2-4";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libffms2-3";
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 23/05/15 14:25, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:13:34PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 22/05/15 02:05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-22 01:31:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 22/05/15 00:11, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>> User: [email protected]
>>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>>
>>>>> libffms2 bumped its SONAME to libffms2-4 and requires a transition. All
>>>>> three
>>>>> reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.
>>>>>
>>>>> x264 is one the reverse dependencies and is also waiting for a transition
>>>>> slot.
>>>>> Maybe we can do these two transitions together?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe.
>>>>
>>>> But first upload to experimental to clear the NEW queue. Then come back to
>>>> us.
>>>
>>> It's already through NEW.
>>
>> Ah good. Please go ahead and upload to unstable.
>
> It was uploaded, so binNMUs scheduled.
And this is done now.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
