Control: tags -1 confirmed On 29/05/15 16:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 29/05/15 11:09, Micha Lenk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 28.05.2015 00:35, schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: >>> On 27/05/15 23:11, Micha Lenk wrote: >>>> [...] As AqBanking's API seems to have stabilized >>>> recently, do you recommend to transition the -dev package to the new name >>>> libaqbanking-dev instead? If so, is there anything to keep in mind if the >>>> old >>>> package libaqbanking34-dev already has a Provides: libaqbanking-dev (it >>>> has it >>>> actually long since)? The reverse dependencies currently all build-depend >>>> on >>>> libaqbanking34-dev. >>> >>> Please rename it to libaqbanking-dev. [...] >> >> I renamed it and uploaded it to experimental as libaqbanking 5.6.0beta-2. It >> is >> currently in NEW. >> >>>> The following reverse dependencies will be impacted by this transition: >>>> >>>> abtransfers >>>> gnucash >>>> kmymoney >>> >>> BTW do the rdeps build against the new version? Or do they need code >>> changes? >> >> I didn't try, but as I am following upstream closely I don't expect that any >> code changes are needed. The SONAME bump was done as a precaution measure >> because some symbols were temporarily added to the library that got removed >> in >> libaqbanking 5.5.1-1 (only in experimental). > > If no other symbols or structs were changed and those that got removed are not > in the version in sid, then I guess it's alright. > > Let us know once the package has been through NEW.
That's happened. You can go ahead with an upload to unstable, followed by severity:serious bugs against the rdeps to update their build-dependency on libaqbanking-dev. Please make those bugs block this one. Cheers, Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
