Your message dated Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:03:25 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#789053: nmu: schroot_1.7.2-2/experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #789053,
regarding nmu: schroot_1.7.2-2/experimental
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
789053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
Could someone schedule a binNMU for schroot in experimental? It still
depends against boost 1.54.
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
nmu schroot_1.7.2-2 . ALL . experimental . -m "Rebuild against boost 1.55"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.0.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-06-17 13:22, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Could someone schedule a binNMU for schroot in experimental? It still
depends against boost 1.54.
Scheduled.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
layered on top of bonghits
--- End Message ---
