Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:52:10 +0200
with message-id <20150829145210.gi3...@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#739266: nmu: hdf5_1.8.8-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #739266,
regarding wheezy-pu: package hdf5/1.8.8-9+deb7u1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
739266: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739266
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi release team,
Please bear with me as this is my very first binNMU request.
I need to have the hdf5 source package rebuilt in wheezy in order to fix
#739261. This is because the current hdf5 release in wheezy was built with
a gfortran older than the one currently in wheezy.
nmu hdf5_1.8.8-9 . ALL . stable -m "Rebuild with current gfortran in wheezy
(closes: #739261)"
Many thanks in advance,
_g.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTAeWrAAoJEO/obGx//s+Dg+QH/jtBfwpXaBGUul3rK8+3f7jx
bqL3T+Kh0zyTZKBDiVJFdCJ5ciu3TJtuEuATGqNgErArnlViVRSpg0FJKchVHvZG
MIQd+/Jj9ywCXX2PdwNTuzAR37/O/KD91b6BcV2yYnIX3WaPYd2snGylgtF8mbjT
YN1nxXkM/tQm08ccE6qWcvD9/2y9w3ust+5dTvaV2xxyiW3m89UOmpM7RIZvzaWN
KBECXzrBqRV1gt9JQfpdudYJPWZ0RCugtjcHXeykjq4jrRl5q0KF56R5l5WuxEHB
gfOPvXL4XTwjky8UwND2jqLU+Hwe932dxfVF5+k9RbaE8+wlz8N7D9GhVrrz4pg=
=gasF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 18:36:45 +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> Julien Cristau wrote, On 17/02/2014 18:07:
> > On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:15:48 +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote:
> >> Are there plans to make libhdf5-serial-dev work again, aka #706044?
> >>
> > #706044 is very much not "make libhdf5-serial-dev work again".
>
> Indeed. AIUI #706044 is about re-enabling the HDF5 C++ API.
>
> > And is
> > IMO not material for stable, though OMMV.
>
> Hmm... YMMV for sure. My take is that we re-introduce something that
> shouldn't have been removed in the first place. This C++ API is in
> squeeze and will be in jessie. It makes sense to enable it in wheezy as
> well. And I fail to see potential nasty side effects.
>
I don't think it's worth touching oldstable for this, AIUI this is all
sorted in jessie. Closing.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
