Your message dated Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:42:16 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#793621: transition: vtk6
has caused the Debian Bug report #793621,
regarding transition: vtk6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
793621: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=793621
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 with 792883 793604 793605 793607
There is an uncoordinated, ongoing transition for vtk6.
vtk6 failed to build on armel/armhf. Also some of the rdeps (gammaray,
liggghts, nifti2dicom) currently fail to build.
Anton, as a library maintainer I would have expected you to
- coordinate the transition with the RT
- test-build the rdeps to check for FTBFS bugs
- file bugs for the rdeps, prepare patches, offer to NMU...
- not break vtk6 on some arches in the middle of the transition
Please help fix the remaining issues as this is blocking other
transitions.
Also it'd be good if you gave a status update on the vtk5 -> vtk6
transition.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 18:45:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: transition
> Control: block -1 with 792883 793604 793605 793607
>
> There is an uncoordinated, ongoing transition for vtk6.
>
libvtk6.1 is no longer in testing, closing.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
