On 02.10.2015 00:20, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 02/10/15 00:17, Daniel Stender wrote: >> On 01.10.2015 23:35, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> Control: tags -1 - pending >>> >>> On 01/10/15 21:33, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >>>> Processing commands for [email protected]: >>>> >>>>> tag 793044 pending >>>> Bug #793044 [release.debian.org] transition: libvigraimpex >>>> Added tag(s) pending. >>> >>> We use pending in a special way for transition bugs (when the package has >>> migrated to testing but the old libraries haven't been removed yet). >>> >>> Emilio >> >> O.k! I would guess closing the bug by "Closes:" isn't all right, then? > > It's not. We'll close it when the transition is over (binNMUs have been > scheduled, packages have been rebuilt and everything has migrated). > > Cheers, > Emilio
O.k. I'll remove that. Thx for correction and info. Dan -- 4096R/DF5182C8 46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8 LPI certified Linux admin (LPI000329859 64mz6f7kt4) http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
