On 01/10/2015 10:35 p.m., Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 01/10/15 20:47, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >> On 01-10-15 20:24, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>> On 10/08/15 10:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: >>>> On 01-07-15 16:39, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>>> The gfortran module version 14 is triggered by making gfortran-5 the >>>>> default >>>>> gfortran (which should happen at the same time as the C/C++ default >>>>> switch). >>>>> >>>>> It affects all packages depending on gfortran modules, the previous >>>>> transition >>>>> tracker bug https://bugs.debian.org/746805 has a list of packages, which >>>>> probably need some updates. >>>> Please see the thread on debian-release@ about the collision with the >>>> netcdf transition: >>>> >>>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/08/msg00247.html >>> Are you still waiting for an ack on this, or did this start already? Can you >>> give a status update? >> The netcdf transition completed some time ago, I started it without >> getting a go-ahead or other feedback from the Release Team because I was >> fed up with waiting for the requested feedback and wanted to get it out >> of the way to unblock the gfortran transition, and it subsequently >> unblocked various transitions for the Debian GIS team by trigging the >> gdal transition. >> >> While I haven't followed the gfortan module transition progress, I think >> that's also done by now. > Have all the packages that ship .mod files been rebuilt? Yes.
> Emilio > -- Alastair McKinstry, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry Misentropy: doubting that the Universe is becoming more disordered.
