Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:37:49 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#801793: transition: polyml
has caused the Debian Bug report #801793,
regarding transition: polyml
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
801793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
The latest upstream version of polyml has bumped the soname up to 6.0.0
(upstream had 2, 3, 4 and 5, including some minor version bumps, but none of
these were ever packaged).
Ben file:
title = "polyml";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libpolyml1" | .depends ~ "libpolyml6";
is_good = .depends ~ "libpolyml6";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libpolyml1";
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 14/10/15 18:17, James Clarke wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: transition
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: [email protected]
>
> The latest upstream version of polyml has bumped the soname up to 6.0.0
> (upstream had 2, 3, 4 and 5, including some minor version bumps, but none of
> these were ever packaged).
AFAICS you have no rdeps at all. In this case there's no need to request a
transition slot. Just go ahead and do it whenever you want.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
