Your message dated Sat, 17 Oct 2015 19:10:02 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#802086: nmu: plastimatch_1.6.2+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #802086,
regarding nmu: plastimatch_1.6.2+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
802086: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802086
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu plastimatch_1.6.2+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
insighttoolkit4 4.8.1"
There isn't a transition tracker since insighttoolkit4 is not in
testing. Verified building in sid/amd64 pbuilder.
The other rdeps of insighttoolkit4 have additional FTBFS bugs.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 17/10/15 15:30, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu plastimatch_1.6.2+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
> insighttoolkit4 4.8.1"
>
> There isn't a transition tracker since insighttoolkit4 is not in
> testing. Verified building in sid/amd64 pbuilder.
> The other rdeps of insighttoolkit4 have additional FTBFS bugs.
Scheduled on amd64 and i386 rather than ANY.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
