Your message dated Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:53:29 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#806502: nmu: samba_2:4.1.21+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #806502,
regarding nmu: samba_2:4.1.21+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
806502: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806502
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu samba_2:4.1.21+dfsg-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with debhelper
9.20151126"
nmu nordugrid-arc-ldap-infosys_5.0.4-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with
debhelper 9.20151126"
nmu mdadm_3.3.4-1.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with debhelper 9.20151126"
nmu unattended-upgrades_0.86.5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with debhelper
9.20151126"
debhelper 9.20151116 introduced a change that caused problems during
removal of some packages (#806276). This has subsequently been reverted,
so the packages built with the buggy debhelper inbetween need to be rebuilt.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 28/11/15 04:25, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu samba_2:4.1.21+dfsg-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with debhelper
> 9.20151126"
> nmu nordugrid-arc-ldap-infosys_5.0.4-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with
> debhelper 9.20151126"
You probably meant nordugrid-arc there.
> nmu mdadm_3.3.4-1.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with debhelper 9.20151126"
> nmu unattended-upgrades_0.86.5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with debhelper
> 9.20151126"
That one is arch:all. The other three are scheduled.
> debhelper 9.20151116 introduced a change that caused problems during
> removal of some packages (#806276). This has subsequently been reverted,
> so the packages built with the buggy debhelper inbetween need to be rebuilt.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
