Your message dated Wed, 2 Dec 2015 19:07:56 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#806892: nmu: getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #806892,
regarding nmu: getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
806892: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806892
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
getfem++ was failing to build on ppc64el due to a bug on scilab (#798651).
Since scilab was fixed (see #798652), getfem++ now builds without errors.
I tested it using sbuild with sid.
nmu getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5 . ppc64el . -m "Rebuild since it was
failig due to problem on scilab which was corrected."
Regards.
Fernando
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 02/12/15 16:14, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> getfem++ was failing to build on ppc64el due to a bug on scilab (#798651).
> Since scilab was fixed (see #798652), getfem++ now builds without errors.
> I tested it using sbuild with sid.
>
> nmu getfem++_4.2.1~beta1~svn4635~dfsg-5 . ppc64el . -m "Rebuild since it was
> failig due to problem on scilab which was corrected."
For the next time, since the package wasn't built, what you need here is a give
back, not a binNMU.
give backs are requested by mailing [email protected].
I have scheduled it anyway.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
