Your message dated Sun, 10 Jan 2016 15:46:56 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#810611: nmu: plastimatch 1.6.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #810611,
regarding nmu: plastimatch 1.6.2+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
810611: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810611
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal
Hello,
two packages have been uploaded with new SO versions: gdcm and dcmtk.
insighttoolkit4 is already build against these but plastimatch still
pulls in the old packages. Please rebuild plastimatch to update these
dependencies.
nmu plastimatch 162+dfsg-2 . i386,amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against
libgdcm2.6 and libdcmtk5 to correct dependency'
Thanks,
Gert
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/01/16 14:17, Gert Wollny wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> two packages have been uploaded with new SO versions: gdcm and dcmtk.
> insighttoolkit4 is already build against these but plastimatch still
> pulls in the old packages. Please rebuild plastimatch to update these
> dependencies.
>
> nmu plastimatch 162+dfsg-2 . i386,amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against
> libgdcm2.6 and libdcmtk5 to correct dependency'
That package failed to build last time it was uploaded (and binNMUed):
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=plastimatch
That needs fixing first.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
