Your message dated Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:39:03 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#810677: nmu: tarantool_1.6.7.551.ga5bafc5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #810677,
regarding nmu: tarantool_1.6.7.551.ga5bafc5-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
810677: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810677
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu tarantool_1.6.7.551.ga5bafc5-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
binutils 2.25.90.20160101"
Isn't there a way to automate these binNMUs on new binutils snapshots?
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 11/01/16 10:00, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: [email protected]
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu tarantool_1.6.7.551.ga5bafc5-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against
> binutils 2.25.90.20160101"
>
> Isn't there a way to automate these binNMUs on new binutils snapshots?
No.
Scheduled; thanks.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
