Package: release.debian.org Severity: important User: [email protected] Usertags: britney
Hi, I was totally surprised to get this mail already today after 5 days instead of after 10 days: https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lynx/news/20160131T163912Z.html src:lynx migrated to testing within 5 days, despite: * Explicit urgency=low. I consider ignoring this setting a quite important issues. I really wanted more exposion for this package as it contained some changes which might break things. * New source package name, i.e. it's the first upload to unstable since the package went through NEW (two uploads to experimental inbetween, though), but it's definitely a source package which wasn't in Testing before. (Not sure if I understand the used metrics in this case completely.) See https://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lynx.html for the dates. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (980, 'unstable-debug'), (600, 'testing'), (111, 'buildd-unstable'), (111, 'buildd-experimental'), (110, 'experimental'), (105, 'experimental-debug') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
