Your message dated Sun, 7 Feb 2016 16:23:25 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#812887: transition: iptables
has caused the Debian Bug report #812887,
regarding transition: iptables
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
812887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812887
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.
The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if any).
Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:
* xtables-addons: no problems
* connman: no problems
* west-chamer: no problems
So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.
[0] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-iptables.html
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
Ben file:
title = "iptables";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ "iptables-dev" | .build-depends ~ "libxtables10"
| .build-depends ~ "libxtables11";
is_good = .build-depends ~ "libxtables11";
is_bad = .build-depends ~ "libxtables10";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:58:41PM +0100, Arturo Borrero Gonzalez wrote:
> iptables 1.6.0 has been released and we plan to include it in debian.
>
> The libxtables binary package name has been changed from libxtables10 to
> libxtables11. However, this change seems to affect very few packages (if any).
>
> Since an upload to experimental was done, a transition was set up [0].
> Following the instructions [1] for transition, I've build-tested all
> reverse build-deps of iptables and they seem to build simply fine:
>
> * xtables-addons: no problems
> * connman: no problems
> * west-chamer: no problems
>
> So, I ask for a transition slot to upload iptables 1.6.0 to unstable.
The transition completed.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire [email protected]
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
