Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:56:48 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#813567: nmu: apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #813567,
regarding nmu: apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
813567: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813567
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu
nmu apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
lttoolbox"
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_IN.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_IN.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--
Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_
{0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 03/02/16 09:18, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 03/02/16 08:57, Kartik Mistry wrote:
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: [email protected]
>> Usertags: binnmu
>>
>> nmu apertium-lex-tools_0.1.1~r60994-1+b1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
>> lttoolbox"
>
> Will you first explain, as asked earlier on #791195, why you reverted the
> renamed package for the libstdc++ transition?
The revert got reverted, so this is no longer needed.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
