Your message dated Fri, 26 Feb 2016 18:23:47 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#813019: transition: nfft 3.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #813019,
regarding transition: nfft 3.3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
813019: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813019
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I would like to request a transition for the latest version of nfft from
experimental to unstable.
Some API breaking changes were introduced from in version 3.3.0 and current
rdeps of nfft will require appropriate patching. The following bugs have been
filed with severity important:
* pynfft: #812997
* yorick-ynfft: #812995
Let me know if further action is required on my end. I intend to fix pynfft,
since I am the personal maintainer and upstream author of the package.
Best regards,
Ghis
Ben file:
title = "nfft";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libnfft3-1" | .depends ~ "libnfft3-2";
is_good = .depends ~ "libnfft3-2";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libnfft3-1";
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (2, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.3.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 02/02/16 20:57, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Since there are no collisions with other transitions, I guess you can go
> ahead.
This is over now. Closing.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
