Your message dated Sat, 5 Mar 2016 16:23:55 +0100
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#816823: nmu: freqtweak_0.7.2-4.1 rapidsvn_0.12.1dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #816823,
regarding nmu: freqtweak_0.7.2-4.1 rapidsvn_0.12.1dfsg-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
816823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=816823
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: [email protected]
Usertags: binnmu

Last year wxwidgets3.0 renamed its libraries from wx*3.0-0 to
wx*3.0-0v5 as part of the libstdc++6 transition, but there are
still packages using the old libraries. Out of these, freqtweak
and rapidsvn look like they could be fixed by a binNMU.

nmu freqtweak_0.7.2-4.1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new wxwidgets3.0"
nmu rapidsvn_0.12.1dfsg-3 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new wxwidgets3.0"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 05/03/16 16:14, Esa Peuha wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> On 05/03/16 15:08, Esa Peuha wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> User: [email protected]
>>> Usertags: binnmu
>>>
>>> Last year wxwidgets3.0 renamed its libraries from wx*3.0-0 to
>>> wx*3.0-0v5 as part of the libstdc++6 transition, but there are
>>> still packages using the old libraries. Out of these, freqtweak
>>> and rapidsvn look like they could be fixed by a binNMU.
>>>
>>> nmu freqtweak_0.7.2-4.1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new wxwidgets3.0"
>>> nmu rapidsvn_0.12.1dfsg-3 . ANY . -m "Rebuild against new wxwidgets3.0"
>>
>> Have you tried to rebuild them? Is #796450 fixed?
> 
> Sorry, I made a mistake by including rapidsvn in this request.
> However freqtweak is rebuildable (in the Reproducible Builds
> project [1] as well).

No worries. I have scheduled freqtweak.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to